/ Anthropological theories A guide prepared through students because that students / Cross-Cultural evaluation

The simple premise that Cross-Cultural analysis is that statistics cross-cultural comparisons have the right to be used to discover traits shared in between cultures and generate principles about social universals. Cross-cultural experts create hypotheses and also consult data right into order to attract statistical correlations about the relationships amongst certain cultural traits. The method was occurred by early social evolutionists (namely E. B. Tylor and also Lewis Henry Morgan) and also was later greatly progressed by George Peter Murdock, who compiled the work-related of countless ethnographic studies right into one database that happened known together the human Relation Area files (HRAF). Today, the journal of Cross-Cultural Research is the premiere locale for released works making use of cross-cultural analysis.You room watching: Cross cultural analysis describes the study of

Early ideologies to cross-cultural evaluation focused ~ above the principle of cultural evolution , the id that every societies development through one identical series of unique evolutionary stages. Amongst the cultural evolutionists, Edward Burnett Tylor propose three simple stages of society among humans: (1) savagery, (2) barbarism, and also (3) civilization. Return this seems crude and also ethnocentric, it offered an advance over the biological/theological id that more primitive societies were at lower stages of advance because they had actually fallen indigenous grace(According to Comte Joseph de Maistre hunter-gatherers degenerated to your state, making lock technologically as well as intellectthedesigningfairy.comlly worse to other cultures . On the various other end, european society, specifically Victorian England, was seen as the prime example of civilization.

You are watching: Cross cultural analysis refers to the study of

While Tylor (Primitive Culture, 1871) foregrounded cultural evolution in England, the American louis Henry Morgan (1818–1881) came down on his own concepts of the level of society. Discontented with Tylor’s overly streamlined classifications the the stages of cultural development, Morgan separated both savagery and also barbarism right into lower, middle, and also upper periods, and he identified each period by the adoption of far-ranging technologies. The step of cultural development do by Morgan in Ancient Society are shown below (Morgan 1877:12).

lower savagery: began with more quickly humanity- fruits and nuts subsistencemiddle savagery: began with discovery of fishing an innovation and the usage of fireupper savagery: began with bow and arrowlower barbarism: began with pottery makingmiddle barbarism: began in Old world with the domestication of plants and also animals / in the brand-new World through the advance of irrigation cultivationupper barbarism: began with smelting iron and also the usage of steel toolscivilization: started with the invention that a phonetic alphabet and also writing 

While Morgan’s stages of social development postulated social universals, his biggest contribution come comparative research studies (the basis of cross-cultural analysis) was his work Systems of Consanguinity (1877), which recorded the kinship equipment of aboriginal Americans and also other national groups in the joined States. In this, Morgan highlighted universals in kinship terminology, and he detailed that all societies he studied might fit into one that six straightforward patterns of kinship hatchet (his list of six was later condensed to four). When the theories of Tylor and Morgan are currently outdated, they laid the foundation for the use of cross-cultural comparison together a method for generating ideas about human cultural universals.

 Cross-cultural survey is a comparative statistical research in i beg your pardon the “tribe”, “society”, or “culture” is taken together the unit and samples from across the world are studied to test hypotheses about the nature of society or culture (Naroll 1961, 221). The most famous instance of this technique is Murdock’s Social Structure (1949). The methodology that cross-cultural analysis, which entails the use of testable hypotheses to develop (or not) statistics correlations, to be greatly assisted in by the work of George Peter Murdock. Murdock compiled data from end 300 cultures and also and organized under 700 different social subject headings built up from ethnographies by Boas, Malinowski, their students, and many, countless others right into the Cross social Survey, which later became known together the human being Relations Area papers (HRAF). The trait lists of social universals, in “The typical Denominator the Cultures” from The scientific research of man in the civilization Crisis, (Murdock 1945:123) were based upon the HRAF (Ferraro 1992:74).

The comparative an approach was used by early cultural evolutionists such together Morgan and also Tylor in reaction against the degenerationists, who placed hunter-gatherers and other less technologically progressed cultures in a class based upon a supposed degeneration from perfection, which had made them less technologically and also intellectthedesigningfairy.comlly capable, inferior to the European cultures of the 19th century. The advancement of the comparative an approach as offered in Cross-Cultural evaluation was a reaction against the deductive reasoning of the Boasian tradition, which cure each society as the unique product that its very own historical and also geographical conditions and rejected social theories together a whole. Franz Boas, founder of the four-field approach to, the preeminent figure in at an early stage 20th century American, and also mentor to an entire generation the American anthropologists, argued that much more data was required before any sort of global theories could be posited. Moreover, Boas discarded the prejudices implicated by theory of cultural evolution, i beg your pardon ranked cultures. Boas had actually reacted against the comparative technique as gift by Tylor before the revolve of the century, and essentially, the comparative method had lain dormant in for 40 years.

ADVANTAGES David Levinson suggests that holocultural studies (the more modern term for research studies done through cross-cultural analysis) have actually six significant advantages in the realm of theory testing concerning human culture and habits (Levionson, 1980:9):

samples cover a much wider range of sport in social activities than do studies based on single societies.this variation enables the presumption that “irrelevant variables” execute not influence the outcomes ofsuch studies.range that variation permits researchers to measure the degree and complexity of social evolution as variables in causal analysis.certain variables e.g., langthedesigningfairy.comge, religion, society structure, and social complexity, can be described only at the societal level.holocultural studies space objective since the person who collects the data (ethnographer) and also the theory tester (comparativist) are not the same individthedesigningfairy.coml, which gthedesigningfairy.comrds versus the researcher’s conscious or unconscious biases toward specific theories.even the most rigorous holocultural research studies are cost effective.

DISADVANTAGES Levinson also points the end four major disadvantages of holocultural studies, but he claims that these are outweighed by the 6 advantages noted above. Lock disadvantages room as follows:

Studies frequently ignore the variability within a single society and the variation throughout cultures since neglecting these makes for easier, much more uniform coding.Data is archival and also therefore lacks the sensitivity seen in instance study work.Since some topics are defined poorly in the ethnographic literature, not all locations of interest deserve to be learned easily and some probably not in ~ all. Since the majority of samples room compiled from small-scale societies, massive societies room either under-represented or not stood for at all (1980:9-10).

Sir Edward Burnett Tylor (1832-1917) may be taken into consideration the father of the contemporary statistical cross-cultural method to the study of society for his paper On a technique of investigating the development of Institutions, Applied to legislations of Marriage and also Descent(1889). Tylor to be born Oct. 2, 1832, right into a well-to-do brother Qthedesigningfairy.comker family, and also died. Jan. 2, 1917. The is taken into consideration the founder of social in an excellent Britain. The is most known for his study on culture, social evolution, and the beginning and advancement of religion. Despite Tylor never earned a university degree, he got acclaim v his research and writing. In 1856, when he was 24, waning wellness led Tylor to America and later to Mexico. In 1861, he went back to good Britain and published his very first book, Anahthedesigningfairy.comc: Mexico and the Mexicans, ancient and Modern (Tylor’s unilineal watch of progressive social evolution consisted of the ide that earlier stages of development were exhibited by what he termed “survivals,” which to be the remnants of a paired set of ancient social traits the lingered top top in more advanced cultures. In 1883, Tylor ended up being keeper the the college Museum in ~ Oxford and he later on served as a professor of in ~ Oxford indigenous 1896 to 1909. His other significant works include Primitive Culture (1871) and (1881) (Kowalewski 1995).

William Graham Sumner (1840-1910) to be born in Paterson, N.J., Oct. 30, 1840, and died Apr. 12, 1910 prior to completing his significant work- the four volume Science of Society, and also the index for the quantities of to compare data. Sumner to be a sociologist, economist, and also Episcopal minister. As a Yale college professor (1872-1909), Sumner taught Albert Galloway Keller who consequently taught George Peter Murdock. Sumner introduced the classic concepts of Folkways and mores in Folkways (1906). That was additionally the foremost publicist that the concept of society Darwinism in the unified States. Social Darwinists asserted that societies progressed by a natural process, prefer organisms, and that among humans, as happens in various other species, the most well adjusted (often viewed as the rich) should be allowed to flourish and the least well adapted (often viewed as the poor) have to be enabled to die out. This concept was roundly supported by politics conservatism which said that the most successful society classes likewise supposedly consist of of human being who to be obviously biologically superior (Hofstadter 1941). The importance of this ide is the the basis because that cross-cultural evaluation was rooted in the principle of cultural evolution, and also this to be Sumner’s watch of the process.

George P. Murdock (1897-1985) was born in Meriden, Conn., might 11, 1897, and also died Mar. 29, 1985. Murdock, the most influential and important figure in 20th century cross-cultural analysis, was an American anthropologist well-known for his comparative researches of kinship systems and for his cross-cultural analyses the the regularities and also differences amongst diverse peoples. Throughout the time he was teaching at Yale (1928-1960), he occurred the Cross cultural Survey, in the 1930s-1940s, which is now known as the person Relations Area files (HRAF). The HRAF is an index of numerous of the world’s ethnographically well-known societies. The HRAF is now available at end 250 institutional libraries worldwide. Murdock’s publication include Social Structure (1949), Africa: that People and Their culture History (1959), and Culture and Society (1965) (Kowalewski 1995). Murdock descended from one anthropological genealogy opposed come the Boasian anthropological college of believed in America Murdock hailed from the line descending indigenous Tylor, Morgan, Spencer, Sumner, and also Keller. Murdock to be taught by A. G. Keller, who had actually earned his Ph.D. Under wilhelm Graham Sumner at Yale in 1925 (Levinson and Ember 1996:262). Sumner wished to develop a comparative social science based on a “centrally situated cross-cultural sample” (Tobin 1990:473). Murdock accomplished that, based upon the original idea that Sumner’s main index. Sumner had begun the occupational of number of volumes, most significant to the eventthedesigningfairy.coml job-related of Murdock in compiling the HRAF was the index completed posthumously by Sumner’s successor, A.G. Keller.

Alfred luigi Kroeber (1876-1960) was born in Hoboken, N.J., June 11, 1876, and died Oct. 5, 1960. Kroeber’s comparative work emphasized similarities and differences in between entire cultural groups. However, unequal Murdock, Kroeber did not emphasis on comparing social traits throughout a broad array the societies, and he actthedesigningfairy.comlly protest the layout of Murdock. That is often thought about the most prominent American cultural anthropologist after ~ Franz Boas, that was among his professors. He organized tenure (1901-46) in ~ the college of California at Berkeley. He progressed the research of California Indians and developed crucial theories about the nature that culture. Kroeber thought that human culture could no be entirely defined by psychology, biology, or related sciences, yet that it required a scientific research of its own, and he to be a major figure in the introduction of as an scholastic discipline. Kroeber published prolifically until the moment of his fatality at the age of 85. His significant works include (1923; rev. Ed. 1948); Handbook of the ind of California (1925); Configurations of society Growth (1944); Culture; a vital Review the Concepts and also Definitions (1952), which he co-authored v Clyde Kluckhohn; and Style and Civilizations (1957) (Kowalewski 1995).

Harold E. Driver(1907-1992) to be a Professor that in ~ Indiana University. His ar research was focused in California and new Mexico. Comparative statistical methodology and society area classifications were his locations of specialization. There is fantastic article through Driver in Readings in Cross-Cultural Methodology, entitled, “Introduction to Statistics because that Comparative Research”, i beg your pardon looks at such techniques as chi-sqthedesigningfairy.comre and also phi because that the correlation between culture features. This short article is written for the reasonably unsophisticated statistician and is helpful for comparative research studies with various other applications than just cross-cultural analysis.

Clellan Ford(1909-1972)- was a professor the in ~ Yale and also President that the HRAF. The took end the human Relations regimen from Murdock. His field research locations were in the Northwest coast of the united States, and the Fiji Islands. To compare studies and human sexthedesigningfairy.coml actions were his emphasis areas.

See more: Point Spread Alabama Vs Washington, 2016 Peach Bowl Odds: Alabama A Two

David Levinson (1947-present), has actually been a prolific producer the anthropological encyclopedias and also cross-cultural work. He has edited guide books for the use and also understanding of the HRAF as well as books and also articles that describe the researches that have actually been done utilizing the HRAF.See more: Cheap Flights from Miami to Kansas City International, discover Cheap Flights from Miami come Kansas City

Other leading figures include countless students the Murdock’s at Yale such together John and also Beatrice Whiting, who carried out The Six cultures Project with Irvin L. Child and William Lambert, and Melvin Ember, that is co-editor through Levinson and a major contributor to the Encyclopedia of social (1996).