In mine textbook, it says that the maximum variety of electrons that can fit in any kind of given shell is given by 2n². This would mean 2 electrons could fit in the an initial shell, 8 could fit in the second shell, 18 in the 3rd shell, and also 32 in the fourth shell.

However, i was previously taught that the maximum variety of electrons in the an initial orbital is 2, 8 in the second orbital, 8 in the third shell, 18 in the fourth orbital, 18 in the 5th orbital, 32 in the 6th orbital. Ns am relatively sure the orbitals and also shells space the very same thing.

Which of these two methods is correct and also should be used to discover the number of electrons in one orbital?

I to be in high college so please try to leveling your answer and use relatively basic terms.

You are watching: How many electrons in the third shell electrons electronic-configuration
boost this inquiry
edited jan 22 "17 in ~ 9:54

Melanie Shebel♦
6,30999 gold badges4242 silver- badges8080 bronze title
asked Feb 20 "14 in ~ 4:13

56733 yellow badges77 silver badges1010 bronze title
add a comment |

3 answers 3

active earliest Votes
Shells and also orbitals room not the same. In regards to quantum numbers, electron in various shells will have different values of major quantum number n.

To answer your question...

In the first shell (n=1), us have:

The 1s orbital

In the second shell (n=2), us have:

The 2s orbitalThe 2p orbitals

In the third shell (n=3), us have:

The 3s orbitalThe 3p orbitalsThe 3d orbitals

In the 4th shell (n=4), us have:

The 4s orbitalThe 4p orbitalsThe 4d orbitalsThe 4f orbitals

So another kind of orbitals (s, p, d, f) becomes easily accessible as we go come a covering with greater n. The number in prior of the letter signifies which shell the orbital(s) space in. So the 7s orbital will certainly be in the 7th shell.

Now for the different kinds the orbitalsEach type of orbital has actually a various "shape", together you have the right to see ~ above the snapshot below. You can likewise see that:

The s-kind has actually only one orbitalThe p-kind has actually three orbitalsThe d-kind has five orbitalsThe f-kind has seven orbitals


Each orbital can hold two electrons. One spin-up and one spin-down. This method that the 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, etc., can each host two electrons because they each have actually only one orbital.

The 2p, 3p, 4p, etc., can each host six electrons due to the fact that they each have actually three orbitals, that deserve to hold two electrons each (3*2=6).

The 3d, 4d etc., can each hold ten electrons, due to the fact that they each have actually five orbitals, and also each orbital can hold two electron (5*2=10).

Thus, to discover the number of electrons possible per shell

First, us look in ~ the n=1 covering (the an initial shell). It has:

The 1s orbital

An s-orbital hold 2 electrons. Therefore n=1 shell can hold two electrons.

The n=2 (second) covering has:

The 2s orbitalThe 2p orbitals

s-orbitals can hold 2 electrons, the p-orbitals can hold 6 electrons. Thus, the second shell have the right to have 8 electrons.

The n=3 (third) shell has:

The 3s orbitalThe 3p orbitalsThe 3d orbitals

s-orbitals deserve to hold 2 electrons, p-orbitals can hold 6, and d-orbitals have the right to hold 10, because that a complete of 18 electrons.

Therefore, the formula $2n^2$ holds! What is the difference in between your 2 methods?

There"s crucial distinction between "the variety of electrons feasible in a shell" and "the number of valence electrons feasible for a period of elements".

See more: $ 75 An Hour Is How Much A Year ? Convert $75 Per Hour To Yearly Salary

There"s an are for $18 \texte^-$ in the third shell: $3s + 3p + 3d = 2 + 6 + 10 = 18$, however, aspects in the 3rd period only have actually up to 8 valence electrons. This is due to the fact that the $3d$-orbitals aren"t filled till we acquire to elements from the fourth period - ie. Facets from the 3rd period don"t to fill the third shell.

The orbitals room filled so the the persons of lowest energy are filled first. The energy is approximately like this: