North Dakota measure up 1
a Approved
TypeConstitutional amendmentOriginState legislature

3 text of measure7 Reports and analyses8 route to the ballot9 State profile9.1 Presidential poll pattern
*
dNovember 8Constitutional measure 1 aInitiated Constitutional measure 3 aInitiated Statutory measure 5 a Yes 282,231 86.11% No45,54213.89% Election results from north Dakota Secretary of State

Overview

Constitutional measure up 1 also applied come legislators that are appointed fairly than elected.

You are watching: North dakota residency requirements

<1>

Prior to the passage of measure up 1, the north Dakota Constitution forced state legislators to live in the districts native which castle are chosen for 30 days prior to election day. Consequently, the was feasible for an separation, personal, instance to offer as a legislator in a district that was not their current residence.<1><2>

In the phibìc Dakota Legislature, the revised was titled Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4010.<1>

Text that measure

Ballot summary

The ballot an overview was together follows:<1>

This measure would need a member the the legislature assembly to be a resident of the district from i beg your pardon selected and would prohibit an individual from being seated in the legislative branch assembly if the separation, personal, instance does no live in the ar from which selected.<3>

Ballot language

The ballot language was together follows:<4>

This constitutional measure would amend and reenact section 5 of post IV the the north DakotaConstitution and also prohibit an individual from offer in the legislative assembly, unless the separation, personal, instance livesin the ar from which the or she was selected.<3>

Measure analysis

The measure analysis was as follows:<5>

Constitutional measure No. 1 was put on the ballot by activity of the 2015 north Dakota LegislativeAssembly through the i of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4010 (2015 session Laws, Ch. 500). Ifapproved, this constitution measure would certainly amend and reenact section 5 of write-up IV that the NorthDakota Constitution and also prohibit an separation, personal, instance from offer in the legislature assembly, uneven theindividual lives in the ar from which the or she was selected.Voting “YES” method you grant the measure together summarized above. Poll “NO” method you reject themeasure together summarized above.<3>

Constitutional changes

watch also: short article IV, north Dakota Constitution

The proposed revised amended ar 5 of short article IV the the north Dakota Constitution. The adhering to underlined message was included and struck-through message was deleted by the suggest measure"s approval:<1>

Section 5. Each human being individual elected or appointed come the legislative assembly need to be, top top the job of the election or appointment, a default elector in the district from i m sorry the member was preferred selected and must have been a residents of the state because that one year automatically prior to that election. An individual might not offer in the legislative branch assembly unless the individual resides in the ar from which selected.<3>

Full text

The full text that the measure can be found here.

Support

Constitutional measure 1 was sponsored by Sens. Wealthy Wardner (R-37) and also Mac Schneider (D-42) and Reps. Al Carlson (R-41) and Kenton Onstad (D-4).

Opposition

thedesigningfairy.com has not discovered information on the opposite to constitution Amendment 1. You re welcome send any type of information about opposition to editor
thedesigningfairy.com.

Campaign finance

See also: project finance requirements for north Dakota ballot measures
Total project contributions:
Support: $0.00
Opposition: $0.00

As the February 6, 2017, no ballot question committees to be registered to support or oppose measure 1.<6>

Reports and also analyses

Secretary of state analysis

The phibìc Dakota Secretary that State"s analysis of measure 1 was as follows:<7>

Constitutional measure up No. 1 was put on the ballot by action of the 2015 phibìc Dakota LegislativeAssembly v the i of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4010 (2015 conference Laws, Ch. 500). Ifapproved, this constitutional measure would certainly amend and also reenact ar 5 of post IV the the NorthDakota Constitution and also prohibit an individual from offer in the legislative branch assembly, unless theindividual lives in the ar from which the or she was selected.<3>

Path come the ballot

See also: Amending the north Dakota Constitution

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4010, the law for Constitutional measure 1, was introduced right into the north Dakota legislative branch on January 13, 2015.

See more: Which Sentence Would Stand Out The Most When Scanning A Paragraph? ?

<8>

A simple majority vote in both chambers of the state legislative branch was forced to to express this amendment to the ballot. On April 21, 2015, the north Dakota Senate authorized the amendment, through 44 senators voting "yea" and also three voting "nay." The north Dakota residence of Representatives approved the legislation for the last time the complying with day, with 75 to represent voting "yea" and 17 voting "nay." The measure was enrolled top top April 23, 2015.<8>


Senate vote

April 21, 2015

north Dakota SCR 4010 Senate Vote
ResultVotesPercentage
a Yes 75 81.52%
No1718.48%

aCaliforniaCalifornia Proposition 50, Suspension the Legislators Amendment a

See also